Pendidikan masa depan

Jangkaan Masa Depan Terhadap Aplikasi Teknologi dalam Kandungan Kurikulum dan Penilaian Sekolah Menengah: Satu Kajian Delphi

Saedah Siraj, and Faridah Abdullah, (2005) Jangkaan Masa Depan Terhadap Aplikasi Teknologi dalam Kandungan Kurikulum dan Penilaian Sekolah Menengah: Satu Kajian Delphi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 25 (Malay Language Version) . pp. 5-26. ISSN 0126-5261

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 170Kb

Affiliations

University of Malaya. Faculty of Education
University of Malaya. Faculty of Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain experts‘ consensus on technological application for the future in curriculum contents and evaluation at secondary school level. Eleven experts involved in ICT and educational technology were chosen as respondents. The Delphi Technique was used for this study. The study revealed that 27 technological tools are forecasted to be developed in 15 years to come and 29 items associated with the effects on technology application in curriculum content have reached experts’ consensus. All items that represent future forecast of technological application at secondary school evaluation have reached experts‘ consensus. The findings of this study also indicated technological development has a significant impact on curriculum content and evaluation thus increasing the necessity for curriculum designers in planning for future changes.

Item Type:	Journal
Keywords:	Computer assisted instructions, Technology applications in education, Secondary schools, Malaysia
Subjects:	L Education
ID Code:	5387

1. Amara, R. C., & Salancik, G. R. (1971-1972). Forecasting: From conjectural art toward science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3, 415-426.

2. Ayers, R.U. (1969). Technological forecasting and long-range planning. NY: McGraw-Hill.

3. Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503.

4. Czinkota, M. R., & Ronkainen, I. A. (1997, Disember). International business and trade in the next decade: Report from a Delphi Study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 827-844. Dimuat turun pada November 5, 2005, daripada http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v28/n4/index.html

5. Drucker, P. F. (1989). The new realities: In government and politics, in economics and business, in society and world view. New York: Harper.

6. Dublin, M. (1989). Future hype: The tyranny of prophecy. New York: Plume. Fatimah Hamid Don (1992). Penyediaan kurikulum bagi mencapai matlamat Wawasan 2020: Peringkat institusi pengajian tinggi. Kerta kerja Seminar Kebangsaan PSIMA Ke 3, Persatuan Psikologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

7. Fatimah Hamid Don (1992). Penyediaan kurikulum bagi mencapal matlamat Wawasan 2020: Peringkat institusi pengajian tinggi. Kerta kerja Seminar Kebangsaan PSIMA Ke 3, Persatuan Psikologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

8. Gates, B., Myhrvold, N., & Rinearson, P. (1995). The road ahead. New York: Viking.

9. Gordon, T. J. (1994). Cross-impact method. Washington DC: The United Nations University.

10. Gordon, T. J. & Hayward, H. (1968, Disember). Initial experiments with the Cross-Impact Matrix Method of forecasting. Futures, 2, 100-116.

11. Hass, G. (1987). Curriculum planning: A new approach. Boston: Allyn.

12. Klopfenstein, B. C. (1985). Forecasting the market for home video players: A retrospective analysis (Videodisc player, videocassette recorder, technology RCA, VCR). PhD The Ohio State University. AAT 8510588. Dimuat turun pada Ogos 5, 2005, daripada http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/8510588

13. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

14. McDougall, A., & Squires, D. (1997). A framework for reviewing teacher professional development programs in information technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6(2). Dimuat turun pada Januari 15, 2005, daripada http://www.triangle.co.uk/jit/content/maincontents.asp

15. McGill, J. L. (1998). Computer competencies needed by secondary teachers to be proficient using microcomputers in teaching. PhD Kansas State University. Dimuat turun pada Ogos 13, 2005, daripada http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview/8819240

16. Mills, S. C., & Tincher, R. C. (2003). Be the technology: A development model for evaluating technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 382-401.

17. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. New York: Harper.

18. Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

19. Saedah Siraj (1999). Kurikulum ke arah pembentukan golongan pemikir, perekacipta dan profesional. Jurnal Kurikulum, 1(2), 42-56.

20. Saedah Siraj (2000). Intelek sebagai tumpuan pembinaan kurikulum. Dimuat turun pada November 8, 2000, daripada http://www.planetklik.com.my

21. Saedah Siraj (Ed.). (2001a). Perkembangan kurikulum: Teori dan amalan. Sg. Buloh, Selangor: Alam Pintar.

22. Saedah Siraj (2001b). Pembinaan kurikulum. Dimuat turun pada Mac 2, 2001, daripada http://www.planetklik.com.my

23. Saedah Siraj (2002a, Julai 16). Pengajian kurikulum masa depan untuk pendidikan berkualiti. Ucap Utama di UMS Executive Management Workshop, University of Muhammadiyyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia.

24. Saedah Siraj(2002b, Jun 17). Curriculum planning for future education. Ucap Utama di Seminar on Curriculum and Instruction, CIS, University of Prince Songkla, Pattani Campus, Thailand.

25. Saedah Siraj (2002c). Polisi dan halatuju dasar kurikulum masa depan. Dlm. Sufean Hussin (Ed.), Inovasi dasar pendidikan: Amalan perspektif sistem dan inovasi (hh. 67-79). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

26. Saedah Siraj (2003, Mac 27). M-Learning curriculum for the future. Ucap Utama 2. Dlm. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning (ICML), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

27. Slaughter, R. A. (1996, November). The knowledge base of futures studies as an evolving process. Futures, Vol. 28(9), 799-812. Dimuat turun pada Ogos 15, 2005, daripada http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V653VWC55R2&_cdi=5805&_user3464026&orig=search&_coverDate=11%2F30%2F1996&_sk=999719990&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzzzSkWA&d=ff70d3ca2fb4ba2110c9a1d61ef32a00&ie=/sdarticle.pdf

28. Saedah Siraj (1997). Implementing foresight for future generations. Dlm R. Slaughter (Ed.), The knowledge base of Futures Studies, Volume 3: Directions and Outlooks. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: DDM.

29. Stewart, J. O’Halloran, C., Harrigan, P., Spencer, J. A., Barton, J. R., & Singleton, S. S. (1999, Julai 24). Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: Modified Delphi Technique. BMJ, 319, 224-229. bmj.com. eCME. Dimuat turun pada Mac 13, 2005, daripada http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/319/7204/224

30. Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.